Jay Haque

Muslim science, now an oxymoron

In Pakistan, Science on February 9, 2012 at 5:53 pm

While Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy’s column “On Neutrinos and Angels” did an excellent job tearing apart the frankly ludicrous claims of Muslim ‘science experts’ such as Zakir Naik who tie physics to religious texts, it is in the field of biology where we see the most appalling faith-based pseudo science to understanding the world we live in.

Following in the footsteps of the Creationist craze spreading in the US, there is now a whole host of literature on Muslim Creationism – an attempt to scientifically explain the existence of life through religion, as a response to the widespread acceptance of evolutionary theory.

This Islamic (dev)olution on the science front has been led by the likes of Harun Yahya, alias Adnan Oktar a man whose books are found in many Pakistani homes with titles such as “The Evolution Deceit”, “Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity”, “The Design in Nature” and “Fascism The Bloody Ideology of Darwinism”.

Bear in mind this body of ‘scientific’ literature is written by the same man who has written “The Holocaust lie” and been accused in Turkey of creating an illegal organization, the “Science Research Foundation” for personal gain, blackmail and extortion, not to mention threatening and defaming professors of science. Luckily in Turkey, the professors successfully sued Oktar’s organization. Sadly, in Pakistan, going under the Yahya alias has let this pseudo science permeate among people willing to accept anything with the ‘religion’ label tagged to it.

There are countless critiques of Yahya’s nonsense available, perhaps most poignantly by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins pin pointing factual errors, incorrect photo captions all the way to highlighting how Yahya has simply ignored all scientific research contrary to his ideological standpoint.

To cite just one example, Yahya’s seminal work, The Atlas of Creation is so disgracefully put together that it misidentifies a sea snake as an eel (unrelated species) and labels Google images of fishing-lures as actual species.

Such lies (and lack of research) do nothing but mock the standpoint Muslim creationists hold so dear. What is that standpoint? That Evolution (change via mutation and natural selection across successive generations in the heritable characteristics of biological populations) is false, and that God alone created life. Let’s ignore the fact that Muslim creationists could avoid a lot of pain by simply saying God created the system of evolution to create life. No, that would be too simple. Instead, they have chosen to lie to younger generations of Muslims about the proven fact of evolution, and have helped push Islam into the dark ages of biology.

Where do the lies begin? The question should be, where do the lies end? Fallacies of logic are aplenty in Muslim creationist texts. To cite just one form, relying on the “God of the gaps” fallacy (where gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence of where God’s intervened in creation, proving evolution being false) creationists look foolish again and again as new evidence and new theories come up to fill the gaps they point to as evidence against evolution.

Where are the fossils showing humans evolved, ask creationists? Here they are say scientists. In fact, here are eight different forms from homo habilis to homo sapien. Aha! But where is the ninth and the tenth form ask creationists – that is surely evidence that the theory is flawed. Well, damn, say the scientists – we just dug up two more, which means the last slew of creationist books now need to be updated with newer, smaller gaps.

The above fallacy identifies just one critical reason religion should not step into the domain of science. Religion does not evolve or change fast enough to keep abreast of science, and when religious ‘science experts’ tie key parts of religious texts to science theories or facts that change, all it does is make a mockery of the religion.

This is sadly the state of biology in the Muslim world today, where research is limited the moment it steps into the quagmire of religious pseudo-science; where Muslim scientists and teachers are threatened and/or fear alienation from their community; where young children are taught that God created all living things, but let’s not find out how.

Backdating stories to win in ‘breaking news’ is not cool

In News, Uncategorized on January 24, 2012 at 12:40 am

For those who haven’t noticed, Dawn.com has been doing a good job on the news reporting front lately.

They’ve been getting stuff filed to their website, there is better coordination with their TV channel, and they have increased pace remarkably! This is all good stuff (I always turn to Dawn as at the end of the day, I always consider them the competition, and still expect them to lead the pack) but the pace of story uploads has been perhaps a little too remarkable?

I’m not saying they’re backdating their stories….and I’m not saying there is never a legit reason to backdate….but lets hope the “lets backdate so it looks like we broke it first” syndrome does not become a staple act of local online media.

Technical glitch? Backdating?

The above was (noticed for a while) and captured by my sub Shaheryar Popalzai @Spopalzai

MQM a national party? No says Facebook, Yes says Tribune poll

In News, Pakistan, politics on January 6, 2012 at 12:58 am

So we opted to run an interesting poll today in light of Chaudhry Nisar of the PML-N declaring the MQM to not be a national party. The question:

In your opinion, is the MQM a national party?

We ran this poll (as always) simultaneously on the Tribune site and our Facebook page. The results?

 

The voting on the Facebook page (where one userid = one vote, so cheating would require making a HUGE number of ids, OR convincing a large number of supporters to go vote) went quite heavily against the MQM with 349 people voting so far:

On the Tribune site poll (where there are many ways to cheat – though usually people aren’t invested enough to bother), 2 hours into the poll, the results looked kinda the same with less than 200 people having voted at the time.

Three hours later I check back to find this is the new tally:

Er…

Hm…

Er…

*no comment*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.